Thursday, March 09, 2006

Roe Vs. Wade For Men

A 25 year old man is suing over the issue of male reproductive rights, contending that lack of such rights violates the U.S. Constitution's equal protection clause. Interesting. I don't know if he is some irresponsible jerk weed trying to weasel out of his responsibilities or if this is some clever ploy to highlight the tortured logic of abortion on demand. Think about it, if some guy complains about having to pay child support for the next 20 years your immediate reaction might be to tell him that he should of kept his zipper zipped. If a woman has the same complaint, i.e. an unintended pregnancy, she has other options and no "right thinking" person would tell her she should have kept her knees together. Double standard? You bet your sweet aspercreme.
I don't believe for a second that this case has a bon bon's chance in Star Jone's dressing room. Imagine how more irresponsible some men would become if they could just say "Sorry I was just having some fun, I never intended to father that little bastard, let someone else pay for him." I can't wait to hear abortionist try to explain why this is bad and abortion on demand is good. At least in this man's case he desires to be a cheap skate not a murderer.

1 comment:

CultMan said...

I might be that man, but for the grace of God.... shameful this whole culture of death...