He Should Be Fired, "On Moral Grounds"

Michael Rubin over at NRO's the Corner links to a UK Sun article about a British policeman who refused to guard the Israeli embassy on "moral grounds". I suppose it might be superfluous to add that the refusenik policeman is a Muslim. He should be canned immediately. To protect and serve is just that, it's not choose, protect and serve. How can justice be served when this police officer intervenes in a traffic accident between two citizens one Muslim the other Hindu, Jewish, Catholic, Wiccan, Protestant, Orthodox, Sikh, Mormon, Jehovah's Witness or agnostic? Or does Sharia begin with the hiring of Islamic police officers?